|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/1/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approval EXPIRED (STATUS "E")
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/1/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Print Dummy UDC Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/20/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Potable Water Approval Req
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/28/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Outdoor Residential Storage
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Unlicensed/Inoperable Vehicles
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
SFR PARKING
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Duration and Limitation
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Duration of Approval - Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5) years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5) year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration.
Limitations of Approval - Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of ths Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BLD SEBACKS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Minimum setback from Brighton Street right-of-way shall be 10 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from top of shoreline bank is as follows:
The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BLD HEIGHT
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The building height is not to exceed 35 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
SHORELINE EXEMPTION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption at time of a building permit application.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
LOT COVERAGE
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in rural residential districts are subject to the stormwater requirements in Chapter 18.30 JCC and must meet the "Area of Impervious Surface Coverage" to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the administrator. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface, which includes rooftops, driveways, concrete, etc.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
POTABLE WATER
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building permit application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
EXTERIOR HEIGHT LIGHTS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
SECURITY/HOODED LIGHTS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-SHORELINE VEGETATION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-SHORELINE JURISDICTION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal is located within 200 feet of Ordinary High Water Mark, and is within shoreline jurisdiction per the Shoreline Master Program, Chapter 18.25 Jefferson County Code. The remainder of the parcel, landward of 200 feet from Ordinary High Water Mark is located outside of shoreline jurisdiction and is subject to the Growth Management Act and critical area codes under chapter 18.22 Jefferson County Code.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-GEOTECH CONDITION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All stormwater drainage should be dispersed into areas on the level building area and should be allowd to infiltrate into the ground surface via dispersion/infiltration trenches.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-GEOTECH CONDITION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Site grading soils or debris, landscape debris, or any other material should not be disposed of over the steep shoreline slope or placed at the top of the steep slope.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-GEOTECH CONDITION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Because of the steepness of the slope to the southwest of the building area and the looseness of the sand and gravel on the slope, the slope is a potential erosion hazard area. No clearing or grading should take place on the slope unless a specific plan has been reviewed and approved by a geologist.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Geotech Report Submitted
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A Geotechnical Report dated July 8, 2009 prepared by Stratum Group was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Slide Buffer-Native Vegetation
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Conditions (SFR)
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Seawater Intrusion Areas
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal & At Risk SIPZ-Water Con
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
Water conservation measures:
1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly.
2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water.
3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens.
4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute.
5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures.
6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation).
Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal & At Risk SIPZ-Measures
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
1. Installation of a flow meter.
2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration.
3. Submittal of monitoring data to County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal SIPZ-Mand Potable Water
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ:
1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available.
2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement:
a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application.
3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with Water Con Measures
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Stormwater Plan
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
At the time of a building permit application a stormwater plan in compliance with the Stormwater Managment Manual for Western Washington (current edition) shall be submitted. If the proposal can not meet the prescriptive requirements of the stormwater manual, an engineered stormwater plan shall be required.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CAO/SMP
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Due to a recent Washington State Supreme Court Case: Futurewise v. WA State DCTED, Ecology, Case #80396-0, the Critical Areas Ordinance (Chapter 18.22, JCC) does not apply to development within Shoreline jurisdiction. Only the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (Chapter 18.25, JCC) applies to development within 200 feet of the OHWM.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
LOT CREATED
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel was created through the Shold's Addition to Hadlock on September 25, 1952 under AFN 134220.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ACCESS/ADDRESS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
An address of 270 Brighton Street, Port Hadlock has been assigned to the parcel. Brighton Street is a county local access (C648909).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-ADMIN ROW SETBACK VARIANCE
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In a memo dated October 8, 2009, the PWD stated that they were not opposed to reducing the setback to the righto-of-way to 10 feet. On October 28, 2009, the DRD Lead approved the administrative ROW setback variance to 10 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on September 23, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: conservancy shoreline designation; unstable/unstalbe recent slide shoreline slope stability; low landslide hazard area; SUSC aquifer recharge area; coastal SIPZ.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Susc. Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Geohazard Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Coastal SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record.
A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The revised site plan dated September 30, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 28, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a SPAAD only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ZONING
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-General PMT Notice
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once.
The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following:
- All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters
- Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees
- Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there
- Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches
Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Consistent with UDC
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified Development Code (Section 8.7). The criteria for approval is as follows:
1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code.
Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development.
2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements.
Staff comment: The parcels total approximately .82 acres and the site plan as submitted complies with UDC Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards.
There is an existing septic system (SEP73-0215) on site. A reserve/repair area was designated and approved on 6/24/09 per plan received 6/10/09. A well was drilled less than 100' to the drainfield in violation of code. Prior to issuance of further permits, the well will need to be decommissioned by a licensed driller and documentation provided to the Health Department unless an alternate plan acceptable to the Jefferson County Health Officer is proposed and approved. Potable water is required at time of building permit application. The SPAAD does not vest for potable water.
An address of 270 Brighton Street, Port Hadlock has been assigned to the parcel.
The approved site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. Sections JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070 of the Jefferson County Code requires the project applicant prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction, to address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow due to the application as proposed identifies the parcel as utilizing a well. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting. Application of Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source and storage.
3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21C RCW.
Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four (4) dwelling units.
4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare.
Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
SEP ON FILE- WELL VIOLATION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Septic Permit approved under SEP73-215, given an OK to Cover 8/7/1973. A reserve/repair area was designated and approved on 6/24/09 per plan received 6/10/09. A well was drilled less than 100' to the drainfield in violation of code.
Prior to approval of a building permit for a building containing plumbing the existing system must be reviewed for compliance with current code. Based on information submitted to date the soils are excessively coarse and pretreatment is required prior to disposal and the tank is not sized adequately. Any changes, alterations or modification of the site in the vicinity of the approved design may invalidate this permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
WELL IN VIOLATION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A well was drilled less than 100' to the drainfield area in violation of code. The Manual of Septic Tank Practice, 1967 in effect until 1984 requires a 100' setback between a well and drainfield disposal system. Prior to issuance of further permits the well will need to be decommissioned by a licensed driller and documentation provided to the Health Department unless an alternate plan acceptable to the Jefferson County Health Officer is proposed and approved.
|
|