|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/6/2019
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
DCD Review Time
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
4/6/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/14/2016
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Site Plan
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on March 14, 2016 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Progress towards completion
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Exempt Maintenance Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
No Fill or Other Material
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
JCC 18.25.320(2)(D)
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Solid and liquid wastes an untreated effluents shall not be allowed to enter any ground water or surface water or to be discharged onto land. The release of oil, chemicals, genetically modified organisms or hazardous materials onto land or into the water is prohibited.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
JCC 18.25.520(4)(L)
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Non-emergency construction and repair work shall be schduled for that time of year when seasonal conditions (weather, streamflow) permit optimum feasible protection of shoreline ecological functions and processes.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-EXEMPT FROM JCC 18.22
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This proposal is exempt from the critical area ordinance, per JCC 18.22.070(3), for maintenance of an existing road.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-EXEMPT FROM JCC 18.30.070
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This proposal as road maintenance is exempt from requirements of the stormwater management regulations in JCC 18.30.070, per JCC 18.30.070(2).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 6, 2016 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:marine shoreline, fish and non-fish bearing streams, wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, FEMA floodplains, aquifer recharge area, coastal seawater intrusion protection zone, high risk, moderate risk, and disconnected channel migration zone.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan as submitted with the shoreline exemption of installation of milled in centerline rumble strips application on March 14, 2016 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 6, 2016 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a shoreline exemption for installation of milled in centerline rumble strips only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-General PMT Notice
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once.
The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments are included as "critical habitat" for listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following:
- All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters
- Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees
- Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there
- Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches
The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a "take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project.
Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section JCC 18.25.560(2) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|