|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/6/2018
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/28/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/28/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
A Clock Interrupt
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/28/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-DRD
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/28/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/26/2012
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Discharge oil: state & fed regs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proponents shall comply with all relevant state and federal regulations pertaining to the discharge of oil.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Treated Materials Must be Cured
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All lumber and other materials treated with preservative shall be sufficiently cured to minimize leaching into the water or shore bed, in accordance with the Best Management Practices approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Exempt Maintenance Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
No Fill or Other Material
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
FEMA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal has recieved review and approval under Army Corps permt NWS-2004-887 in consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service, and based upon a Biological Evaluation dated February 9, 2005 and amended February 11, 2011. The applicant shall comply with said permit and the subsquent Army Corps letter dated July 26, 2011.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-ARMY CORPS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Army Corps of Engineers (COE) issued a permit on May 10, 2006 under Permit Number NWS 2004-887. The Corps has granted an extension to that permit that expires on February 15, 2014. Applicant shall comply with said conditions of permit, and the letter dated July 26, 2011 under the aftermentioned reference number.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this activity on September 16, 2011 under Control Number 123964-1. The HPA expires on September 16, 2016
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
CAO
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal is exempt from Critical Area review under JCC 18.22.070(6) & (21).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on May 21, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas Conservancy - Aquatic Shore Designation (overwater-marine).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-DNS Issued
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal has received review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) through a Final Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued by Jefferson County on June 2, 1999. The mitigation measures are address through existing development regulations and required permits. This threshold determination was for routine maintenance dredging of the marina access channel of accumulated sediments and disposal on an approved upland location. Because the proposal has not changed significantly from what was analyzed through the previous threshold determination, no additional SEPA review is required for this proposal (WAC 197-11-800).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan as submitted with the Shoreline Exempt application on December 24, 2012 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated January 15, 2013 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a Shoreline Exemption for Repair and Maintenance activities as outlined in Section 6b of the submitted JARPA only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-General PMT Notice
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once.
The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following:
- All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters
- Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees
- Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there
- Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches
The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a "take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project.
Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section JCC 18.25.090(6) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|