|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/24/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Issue Exemption
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/29/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/29/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/22/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/27/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
No Fill or Other Material
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal & At Risk SIPZ-Water Con
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
Water conservation measures:
1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly.
2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water.
3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens.
4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute.
5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures.
6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation).
Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal & At Risk SIPZ-Measures
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ:
1. Installation of a flow meter.
2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration.
3. Submittal of monitoring data to County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Coastal SIPZ-Mand Potable Water
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ:
1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available.
2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement:
a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application.
3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Hydraulic Code/HPA Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The property was reviewed for potential eagle and osprey habitat. WDFW issued a no conflict for osprey habitat on 10/17/03. Eagles were reviewed by WDFW and a response was not provided within the allocated timeline.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Washington Dept. of Health has granted approval of the Group A water system. On 9/15/03 DOH approved the system identified under permit no. 03-0808.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 3, 2003 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone, Shoreline, and Shoreline (Suburban).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Coastal SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record.
A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Stormwater
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant is proposing to create or add 164 square feet of impervious surface. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal adhere to the small parcel stormwater provisions (see attached).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-DNS Issued
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) wass issued on October 23, 2003.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan as submitted with the Shoreline application on 9/26/03 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 24, 2003 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a 17,000 gallon water tank replacement only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.6 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|