|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/24/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve SDP Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/21/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/25/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Application Received-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/1/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/1/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/25/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/17/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Treated Materials Must be Cured
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All lumber and other materials treated with preservative shall be sufficiently cured to minimize leaching into the water or shore bed, in accordance with the Best Management Practices approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
No Fill or Other Material
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Hydraulic Code/HPA Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Army Corps Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal will occur in lands covered by water and was not reviewed for Environmentally Sensitive Areas per Section 3 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All work will be performed in the water and no land disturbance will take place.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-No ESAs Found
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development for the presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). The Department conducted a review and has concluded that the property DOES NOT contain Environmentally Sensitive Areas. However, future proposals will be subject to a new ESA review and conditions may be added if new ESAs are found on the property.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan as submitted with the shoreline exemption application on July 30, 2003 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 9/17/03 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for the replacement of two pilings only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.(6) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|