Permit Case Summary

Case Number: Search Help

Case Number:SDP2002-00009 Case Status:Finaled Date Received:2/28/2002
Description:Shoreline Exemption for the repair and remodeling of a 3500 square foot wooden structure built in 1920. The previous owner used most of the building for storage, but with a small office and workshop. The building is being designed for Boat School classroom and shop activities. Interior construction includes totally new electrical, plumbing and heating. Restrooms will be ADA compliant. The classrooms and restroooms will be heated while the shop area remains unheated. Exterior repairs involve a new roof and porch, replacement of damaged siding, and relocation and addition of several windows and doors. The building will be ulilized for Boat School classroom and shop activites. There will also be replacement of a limited number of foundation beams, flooring and wall studs. Date Issued:4/16/2002
Applicant: NORTHWEST SCHOOL OF WOODEN Expiration Date:4/16/2003 12:00:00 AM
Site Address:32 N WATER ST Case Finaled:
Parcel No:989400702 Other Cases Parcel Data Map It

Case Actions
Below is a list of actions that have been taken by staff for this permit case. They are sorted based on the date they were added to the database with most recent actions at the top. A value in the "Date Completed" field indicates that the action has been completed.
Description: File Archived
Date Completed: 3/23/2004
Disposition: DONE
Description: Close case
Date Completed: 5/1/2003
Disposition: DONE
Description: Review Complete-U
Date Completed: 4/16/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Approve Exemption-UF
Date Completed: 4/16/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Det. of Completeness-UF
Date Completed: 3/28/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Additional Info Request-U
Date Completed: 3/18/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Case Entered
Date Completed: 2/28/2002
Disposition:
Description: App Substantially Complete-U
Date Completed: 3/28/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Stormwater Review-U
Date Completed: 3/28/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
Date Completed: 4/16/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Consistency Review-U
Date Completed: 4/16/2002
Disposition: DONE
Description: Application Received-UF
Date Completed: 2/28/2002
Disposition: DONE

Case Conditions
Below is a list of conditions for this permit case. Conditions typically record requirements that the applicant must meet to be in compliance with the permit.
Title: ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Wording In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval, as applicable.

Title: NOTIFICATION
Wording The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development at 360-379-4450 forty-eight (48) hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure compliance with permit conditions.

Title: PERMIT CONDITION
Wording This permit constitutes permission to repair and remodel the existing 3500 square foot building known as the Rutter Building located at 290 Water Street, Port Hadlock, Washington. Permission to enlarge or expand the structure is not authorized.

Title: NORMAL REPAIR
Wording The authorized repairs and remodeling shall result in a building that is essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration and external appearance.

Title: Hydraulic Code/HPA Check
Wording Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state.


Case Findings
Below is a list of findings for this permit case. Findings typically record facts that the staff are using as the basis of their permit processing decisions.
Title: F-Confirmed ESAs
Wording The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on March 28, 2002 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: SHORELINE WETLAND; SUSCETPIBLE AQUIFER RECHARGE WITH COMMERCIAL; FLOOD HAZARD AREA; SEISMIC HAZARD AREA; PURPLE MARTIN NESTING AREA; TYPE 1 MARINE SHORELINE; AND URBAN SHORELINE DESIGNATION.

Title: F-Aquifer Recharge Area
Wording Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County.

Title: F-Susc. Aquifer Recharge Area
Wording Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.

Title: F-SEPA Exempt
Wording Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3).

Title: F-NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE
Wording The subject building (Rutter Building) was constructed in 1920 and is a legal non-conforming structure that is presently located within the Rural Village Center (RVC) zone of Lower Hadlock.

Title: F- S.L. DESIGNATION
Wording The subject property has an Urban Shoreline designation under the Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County.

Title: F-SDP Exemption Section
Wording The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.6 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.