|
Description:
|
| | |
Print Dummy UDC Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
2/9/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/7/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Issue Building Permit (F)
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/31/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/31/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Set Status to F
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/31/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/29/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Ntc of App +14-APO-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/7/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Ntc of App +14-Publish-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/7/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/6/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/28/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Ntc of App +14-APO-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/10/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Ntc of App +14-Publish-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/10/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/9/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/9/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/26/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/28/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/3/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/29/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/28/2003
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Application Received-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/26/2002
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Stormwater Inspection
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Call Jefferson County Permit Center, Development Review Division for inspection of erosion control measures. (360) 379-4463
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Storage of inflammable liquid
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The storage and handling of inflammable liquids, liquified petroleum, gases and explosives shall comply with rules and regulations falling under the jurisdiction of the fire marshal, the laws of the state and other local ordinances. Bulk storage of inflammable liquids below ground shall be located no closer to the property line than the greatest dimension (diameter, length, or height) of the tank.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Shielding of electrical equip
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Provisions shall be made for necessary shielding or other preventive measures against interferences occasioned by mechanical, electrical and nuclear equipment, uses or processes with electrical apparatus in nearby buildings or land uses.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Outside Storage
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Commercial and industrial developments located in all zoning districts hall screen from areas frequented by the general public, all materials stored outside buildings or structures which are not for display or immediate sale. Areas frequented by the general public shall be defined as public streets and rights-of-way, and other areas normally used by the general public located adjacent to the subject property.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Noise
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The intensity of sound emitted by any commercial or industrial activity shall not exceed levels estabished by the Washington State Department of Ecology under WAC 173-60, and by Jefferson County under Resolution No. 67-85, "Establishment of Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement Areas for Jefferson County."
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Sign Permit Required
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Signs shall be reviewed administratively by the Department of Development Review. An administrative determination to approve a sign application shall be made when the proposal is consistent with the goals, policies, and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, and/or applicable community development plan, and this ordinance.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Parking Lot
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All parking lots shall contain 4 or more parking spaces designed and shown on the plot plan with the following elements: a) proposed and existing structures, b) traffic circulation, c) adjoining streets, d) drainage, e) lighting, f) landscaping, g) fencing h) screening. The submitted application identifies approximately 59 parking spaces including four (4) designated handicapped spots.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Access design
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All ingress/egress to a parking lot containing 4 or more parking spaces shall be developed so vehicles entering and leaving the parking lot are traveling in a forward motion.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Security/hooded lights
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Exterior flashing lights
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Exterior flashing, moving, or blinking lighting is prohibited, except as required by local, state, or federal standards.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Lighted signs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Where lighted signs are permitted, such illuminated devices shall be shaded and directed so as not to provide glare toward any adjacent properties.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld Setbacks
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Ness's Corner Road is classified as a Major Collector and requires a minimum 30-foot front yard setback. This setback shall be measured perpendicularly from the lot line to the proposed development. Side setbacks shall be a minimum 5-feet. The rear lot line (southern lot line) is adjacent to residential and shall maintain a minimum 35-foot setback.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld building height
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The building height is not to exceed 35 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Bld lot coverage
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 60%. Lot coverage is defined by the amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal was reviewed for compliance with Sections 6.6 & 6.7 of the Unified Development Code. In addtion, Sections 6.10, 6.13, 6.15 and 8.7 of the UDC apply to this proposal. Section 8.7 identifies criteria for SPAAD approval. The proposal is reviewed under the following criteria:
a. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state and federal land use and environmental and health regulations and plans, including, but not limited to the following: 1) Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 2) The provisions of this code.
Staff Comment: The proposal has been reviewed for compliance with applicable codes and ordinances. The proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and reviewed for compliance will all other applicable state, local and federal codes.
b. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements.
Staff Comment: The proposal has proven to have adequate services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site. Such services include the following:
PUD- Has provided a letter stating the proposal will have a connection to public water.
Sewer- The applicant has submitted test holes and the Jefferson County Dept. of Environmental Heath has reviewed the documentation and has determined that a septic system can be reasonably sited on the property.
Access- WASDOT has submitted a letter of commitment to allow the applicants access off of SR116.
c. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) implementing provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21C RCW.
Staff Comment: The proposal underwent a comprehensive review under SEPA. The entire proposal encompasses 3-phases and was reviewed for the overall impacts of the entire project.
d. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare.
Staff Comment: The proposal complies with all provisions that will protect the public health, safety, and general welfare.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A landscaping plan was prepared in accordance with Section 6.13 of the UDC. The landscape plan will be implemented during the first phase of the proposal. Both Screen C and A will be incorporated and plantings include a mix of conifers, and shrubs.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
An approved building permit is required prior to commencing construction of the proposed buildings.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Soils evaluated 2/14/03 as represented on the plot plan submitted 2/18//03 are suitable for onsite sewage disposal. Per the information provided the uses are not fully determined at this time.
1. Uses will be limited by the volume of sewerage that can be applied to the site per state and county codes.
2. The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewerage system can be installed on the property in an evaluated area. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewerage system design approval.
3. Onsite sewerage systems shall meet the standards and regulations in place at the time of application for the specific use.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Jefferson County Dept. of Public Works reviewed the proposal for compliance with applicable stormwater mangement requirements and issued several recommendations. Said conditions are as follows.
1. The applicant shall meet the Small Parcel Sedimenation and Erosion Control Plan and the Permanent Stormwater Quality Control Plan.
2. Prior to commencing land disturbing activity, the applicant shall notify Jim Pearson, Development Review Project Manager, Jefferson County Department of Public Works, (360) 385-9162.
3. In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are installed as per approved plan, after construction is complete and prior to final approval, the project proponent shall submita letter from the project engineer to the Community Development Department/Public Works Dept. certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed as per the approved plans.
4. In order to meet the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and the Washington Dept. of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin and to ensure that the approved stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project, the project proponent shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County prior to final project approval. After construction of the stormwater management facilities and prior to final project approval, the Public Works Department will send an Agreement to the project proponent to be filed with the Jefferson County Auditor. A copy of the filed Agreement shall be sent to the Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Custom Universal Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations submitted by the Jefferson County Public Works Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
KEEP SEDIMENT OFF ROAD
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall be responsible to keep all sediment off of the Highway during construction of the proposed facilities.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ACCESS PERMIT PRIOR TO FINAL
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall supply Jefferson County with an approved DOT access permit prior to issuance of a final occupancy permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Stormwater Plan
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
An engineered stormwater mangement plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Public notice was republished in the Pennisula Daily newspaper on March 12, 2003.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The submitted engineered plans where reviewed by the Jefferson County of Public Works Department for compliance with commercial stormwater standards.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was modified to include two commercial buildings under the Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination process. The proposal was re-adverstised and reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The public and agency comment period expired on March 26, 2003.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
COVENANT RECORDED
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant has recorded a Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to combine parcel numbers 901-024-064 & 901-024-065. The document was recorded at the Jefferson County Auditors Office under Auditors File No. 467384.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Universal Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson Transit has requested a bus pullout be installed once the buildings have been constructed. The request also included a walkway or path be constructed for public access.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on December 9, 2002 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Stormwater
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal is for the construction of an off-street gravel parking facility to accomodate approximately 59-parking stalls. In addition, phase II of the proposal will construct two commercial buildings totaling 16,544-square feet. The buildings will be utilized in compliance with the Rural Village Center (RVC) zoning permitted uses.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(iv).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-DNS Issued
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on March 26, 2003 utilizing the option DNS process outlined in WAC 197-11-355.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A revised site plan as submitted with the building application on 2/18/03 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 3/27/03 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a Stormwater Management Permit and Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Custom Case Specific Finding
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Several agencies supplied written comment regarding the proposal. Agencies that submitted comments include:
1. Washington Dept. of Ecology- Recommended that during the construction the proposal shall keep all sediment off of the roadway.
2. Washington State Dept. of Transportation- Requesting that the proposal proceed while access is being resolved with their agency. Requested that an occupancy permit not be issued until an access permit is obtained.
3. Jefferson Transit- Requesting a bus pullout to allow for access to the new buildings (Phase II of the proposal).
|
|