Permit Case Summary

Case Number: Search Help

Case Number:ZON2019-00056 Case Status: Date Received:10/23/2019
Description:REMOVAL OF 10 TREES & PRESCRIPTIVE PRUNING OF 40 TREES FOR KALA POINT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, KALA POINT BLUFF MANAGEMENT - INCLUDES BLUFF PARCELS 965000372, 964700081 & 964700082; AND HOMEOWNER PARCELS 965000023, 965000022, 965000020, 964700056, & 964700055. Date Issued:12/17/2019
Applicant: KALA POINT OWNERS ASSOC Expiration Date:12/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
Site Address:83 PINECREST DR Case Finaled:
Parcel No:965000372 Other Cases Parcel Data Map It Parcels Images

Case Actions
Below is a list of actions that have been taken by staff for this permit case. They are sorted based on the date they were added to the database with most recent actions at the top. A value in the "Date Completed" field indicates that the action has been completed.
Description: Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
Date Completed: 10/4/2022
Disposition: DONE
Description: Approve Permit-UF
Date Completed: 12/17/2019
Disposition:
Description: Consistency Review-U
Date Completed: 12/16/2019
Disposition: DONE
Description: Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
Date Completed: 12/16/2019
Disposition: DONE
Description: Stormwater Review-U
Date Completed: 12/16/2019
Disposition: DONE
Description: App Substantially Complete-U
Date Completed:
Disposition:
Description: Case Entered
Date Completed: 10/23/2019
Disposition:

Case Conditions
Below is a list of conditions for this permit case. Conditions typically record requirements that the applicant must meet to be in compliance with the permit.
Title: FOLLOW TREE PRESCRIPTIONS
Wording Buffer Condition. The area within a required shoreline buffer shall be kept in a sufficiently vegetated condition so as to ensure it protects and maintains the existing ecological functions. Existing native vegetation shall be retained, and restoration with native species is required. Prescriptive tree management specifications are found in the report Shoreline Tree Pruning Request, dated September 9, 2019, Appendix B. 10 trees are approved for removal and 40 trees approved for trimming as follows: Area C19-1: 15 trees--all pruned. Area C19-2: 10 trees--7 pruned & 3 removed Area C19-3: 7 trees--2 pruned & 5 removed Area C19-4: 9 trees--8 pruned, 1 cut as habitat tree Area C19-5: 6 trees--6 pruned Area C19-6: 3 trees--2 pruned, 1 removed. Prescriptions in the 9/9/2019 Shoreline Tree Pruning Request, Appendix B shall be followed with the noted exceptions: Recommendations 1-3 for Tree Removal and Slope Stability Maintenance, Geotechnical Evaluation of Proposed Tree Actions, Crescent Environmental, p. 9 shall be followed as written, with added emphasis to revegetating bare ground in Recommendation 3, in response to Wildlife Biological Recommendations, Habitat Management Plan, noting potential areas of bare ground at tree removal locations: Recommendation 3. ANY BARE GROUND on slopes where tree removals take place shall be revegetated in the first planting season following removal using native vegetation, as provided in Appendix A: "Native Plant Species for Maintaining Slope Stability", Crescent Environmental, p. 24. Also, for every tree removed, at least two trees of similar species shall be planted and monitored for survivial for three years. Specific Recommendations of Peninsula Environmental Group (PEG) Report, Section 8, numbers 1) through 10) shall be followed but with these exceptions or additions: Exception to Recommendation 4): If thoroughfare or tree actions expose patches of bare soil without canopy cover, restore with native cover by providing native shrub plantings as needed to restore bare soil. Native plantings may be selected from Crescent Environmental's native plant list in Appendix A: Native Plant Species for Maintaining Slope Stability. Native shrubs may also be selected from the PEG Habitat Management Plan Table 4.3.1 Observed Plant Communities, "Shrubs". Exception to Recommendation 9), regarding which trees to plant & adding native shrubs for mitigation. All tree removals shall be mitigated through the installation of two new NATIVE trees planted within 6 feet of the removed stump. Do NOT use the recommendations of incense cedar (Calodedrus decurrens) which is out of its normal distributional range, or the non-native cultivar Excelsa Red Cedar (Thuja plicata "Excelsa"). Applicant shall follow recommendations from Crescent Environmental, p. 9, Recommendation #3: For every tree removed at least two native trees of similar species shall be planted on monitored for survival for three years. Examples of similar native tree species to use can be found in the Habitat Management Plan at p. 5 of 25, Table 4.3.1 Observed Plant Communities, "Trees" section (also found in report Shoreline Tree Pruning Request, p. 6 of 19, Table 5.2.1 Observed Plant Communities, "Trees" section. Or an appropriate native tree can be selected from the native tree list in the Geotechnical Evaluation, Appendix A: "Native Plant Species for Maintaining Slope Stability", p. 24, table "Middle Strata: Shrubs and Small Trees". Replacement trees shall be selected by their site-specific applicability to hydrology, erosion control value, and their adaptation to relative slope stability conditions. Second exception to Recommendation 9) is to restore any bare ground by providing native shrub plantings as needed to restore bare soil. These may be selected from native shrubs in Crescent Environmental's native plant list in Appendix A: Native Plant Species for Maintaining Slope Stability. Native shrubs can also be selected from the PEG Habitat Management Plan Table 4.3.1 Observed Plant Communities, "Shrubs".

Title: VEGETATION TRIMMING
Wording Vegetation Trimming shall be performed within the standards of JCC 18.25.310(2)(c)(i): Techniques shall include selective pruning, windowing and other measures that preserve native plant composition and structure. No more than 25 percent of a single tree’s leaf bearing crown may be removed and no more than 25 percent of the canopy cover of any stand of trees may be removed for view preservation. If additional trimming is requested in subsequent years, the cumulative removal may not exceed 25 percent. Limbing or crown thinning shall comply with Tree Care Industry Association pruning standards, unless the tree is a hazard tree as defined by this program. Tree topping is prohibited when main stem/trunk is over three inches diameter at breast height (DBH).

Title: VEGETATION REMOVAL
Wording Vegetation Removal & Buffer Condition. The area within a required shoreline buffer shall be kept in a sufficiently vegetated condition so as to ensure it protects and maintains the existing ecological functions. Outside the buffer, vegetation removal shall be the minimum necessary for maintaining shoreline views from the primary structure and to provide lawns or ground cover, and must comply with other applicable requirements such as clearing and grading, forest practices, and protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat.

Title: Slide Buffer-Native Vegetation
Wording Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated and maintained as specified in this permit. No additional alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. If any inadvertent alteration of the buffer occurs during implementation of the approved project, the project proponent shall contact DCD to discuss mitigation measures to be reviewed for approval by DCD.

Title: Geologic Hazard Area
Wording A Geotechnical Evaluation by Crescent Environmental PLLC dated May 31, 2019, was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addresses Kala Point Owners Association tree management & tree removal proposals and provides recommendations with regard to management, revegetation goals, and slope stability of the identified geologic hazard areas. Recommendations regarding tree treatments are addressed at pp. 6-9. Appendix A: Native Plant Species for Maintaining Slope Stability shall be referenced for appropriate shrubs and small trees for revegetation where required. These recommendations are largely incorporated with additional recommendations within two special reports submitted by Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc.--Habitat Management Plan and Shoreline Tree Pruning Request. Detailed conditions are provided in the Permit Conditions portion of this permit.

Title: BMPs
Wording The project shall adhere to Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during work. Stormwater Finding The applicant is not proposing to create or add any impervious surface and the replanting of trees is expected to create minimal land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 of the Jefferson County Code requires that your proposal comply with Minimum Requirement #2 of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (2012 Ecology), managing erosion and stormwater.


Case Findings
Below is a list of findings for this permit case. Findings typically record facts that the staff are using as the basis of their permit processing decisions.
Title: F-SPECIAL REPORTS
Wording The project review is for tree trimming and tree removal in the Shoreline Buffer and a geologically hazardous area, requiring a consistency review, geotechnical report, biologist report, and arborist report.

Title: F-SHORELINE FINDING
Wording The proposal will be conducted within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay. No development is proposed; therefore, no shoreline permit is required.

Title: F-FLOOD FINDING
Wording The proposal is located outside of any flood boundary mapped by FEMA.

Title: F-CONFIRMED ESAS
Wording The Geographic Information Systems mapping review identified the following Critical Areas on the subject property: Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA); Slight, Moderate and High Risk Landslide Hazard areas; Unstable Shoreline Slope Stability with Recent Slides; Special Aquatic Resource Protection Area (SARPA); Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area (SUSC); Coastal Saltwater Intrusion Protection Zone; and Seismic Hazard.

Title: F-SDP Exemption: Residence-SF
Wording The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 18.25.550 which exempts the proposal from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements under certain provisions. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.

Title: F-SEPA Exempt
Wording Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(e).

Title: F-Site Plan Changes
Wording The site plan as submitted with the Tree Removal and Tree Pruning application on October 23, 2019 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated December 17, 2019 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.

Title: F-Approval for _____ Only
Wording This approval is for the current phase of vegetation treatments only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.

Title: F-General PMT Notice
Wording NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.