|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/23/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approval Expiration Ltr (F)
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/23/2013
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Print Dummy UDC Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Site inspection
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/17/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/22/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/6/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/13/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/12/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/13/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/13/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
3/5/2008
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/13/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ARBORISTS REPORT
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
THE ARBORISTS REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2008 NUMBERS EACH TREE AND HAS SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH. EACH TREE AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE LISTED BELOW:
TREE #1 - MADRONE; 60' high and 24" in diameter. About 25' from bluff.
REMOVE ONLY DEAD BRANCHES AS NEEDED. LIVE BRANCHES COMPRISING UP TO 10% OF THE CANOPY MAY BE REMOVED AT THEIR POINT OF ORIGIN ON THE TRUNK OF THE TREE.
TREE #2 - DOUGLAS FIR; canopy extends approximately 30' above the rim of bluff.
CAN WITHSTAND WINDOWING UP TO 25% OF ITS CANOPY.
TREE #3 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends about 25' above the rim of bluff.
CAN WITHSTAND WINDOW PRUNING OF UP TO 25% OF CANOPY.
TREE 4 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy about 15' above rim of bluff.
CAN WITHSTAND WINDOW PRUNING OF UP TO 25% OF CANOPY.
TREE 5 - WESTERN HEMLOCK; growing on slope and canopy extends about 12' above the rim of bluff.
CAN WITHSTAND 15% OF THE FOLIAGE TO BE WINDOWED.
TREE 6 - WESTERN HEMLOCK; growing on slope and canopy extends 5' above the rim of bluff.
UP TO 15% OF THE FOLIAGE CAN BE WINDOWED.
TREE 7 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope and canopy extends about 15' above the rim of bluff.
UP TO 25% OF FOLIAGE CAN BE WINDOWED.
TREE 8 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on rim of the bluff and is about 18' high and 20" in diameter. Top 15' of tree is dead.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE WINDOWED.
TREE 9 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends about 40' above rim of the bluff.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE CAN BE WINDOWED.
TREE 10 - MADRONE; growing about 20' back from the edge of bluff, about 60' high and 18" in diameter.
DEAD WOOD MAY BE REMOVED AND UP TO 10% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED FOR WINDOWING. BRANCHES SHOULD BE REMOVED AT THEIR POINT OF ORIGIN.
TREE 11 - MADRONE; located above the rim of bluff and about 60' tall and 18" in diameter.
UP TO 10% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 12 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff.
TREE IS DEAD AND CAN BE REMOVED WITHOUT IMPACT TO THE STABILITY OF THE BLUFF.
TREE 13 - WESTERN RED CEDAR; growing on bluff and canopy extends about 25' above the rim of the bluff.
UP TO 25% FOLIAGE CAN BE WINDOWED.
TREE 14 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends about 50' above the rim of the bluff.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 15 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on the edge of the bluff about 60' high and 12" in diameter.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 16 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on top of the bluff, about 70' high and 24" in diameter.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 17 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on the slope, canopy extends about 45' above the rim of bluff.
UP TO 25% OF CANOPY MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 18 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends about 30' above rim of bluff.
UP TO 25% OF CANOPY MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 19 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends about 45' above the rim of bluff.
UP TO 25% OF CANOPY MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 20 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on slope of bluff and canopy extends 25' above the rim of bluff.
UP TO 25% OF THE FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 21 - DOUGLAS FIR; the trunk of the tree seems to originate about 10' back from the ede of the top of bluff. It appears to have fallen and remained growing.
MAY TOP WHERE THE CANOPY EXTENDS ABOVE THE RIM OF THE BLUFF.
TREE 22 - WESTERN RED CEDAR; growing on edge of bluff, has 3 trunks, two of which are in severe decline. The trunk furthest from the bluff is in the best health.
THE TWO TRUNKS CLOSEST TO THE BLUFF SHOULD BE REMOVED, THOUGH THE EXISTING ROOTS SHOULD NOT BE DISTURBED. THE THIRD TRUNK SHOULD BE MONITORED YEARLY FOR FURTHER SIGNS OF DECLINE.
TREE 23 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing adjacent to Tree 22 and has a corrected lean towards the bluff, 35' high and 10" in diameter.
UP TO 25% OF FOLIAGE MAY BE REMOVED.
TREE 24 - DOUGLAS FIR; growing on top of bluff and is about 45' high and 11"
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
SALAL AND UNDERSTORY
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
THERE IS DENSE NATIVE GROUNDCOVER GROWING FROM THE EDGE OF THE BLUFF WHICH EXTENDS APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET BACK TOWARDS THE RESIDENCES. THE GROUNDCOVER CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF SALAL WITH HONEYSUCKLE, BLACKBERRY, OREGON GRAPE AND OCEANSPRAY INTERSPERSED WITHIN THIS AREA.
GROUNDCOVER SHOULD NOT BE MOWED AS IT PLAYS A VITAL ROLE IN STABILIZING THE SOIL.
GROUNDCOVER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW AND CAN BE SUCESSFULLY MAINTAINED AT 18" - 24" BY PRUNING.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
WDFW
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Shelly Ament, WDFW biologist commented on November 20, 2007 stating that Kala Point has an existing Eagle plan in place and no additional Eagle plan is required. WDFW prefers vegetation work to be completed prior to February 1 as the Bald Eagle breeding and nesting season is from February 1 to August 15 annually.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Landslide Vegetative Buffer
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A vegetative buffer of 30-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top or toe of the Landslide Hazard Area.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Slide Buffer-Native Vegetation
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Permanent Landslide Boundary
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Conditions (SFR)
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Seawater Intrusion Areas
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ARBORISTS REPORT
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
An arborists report dated February 13, 2008 prepared by Richard Hefley was submitted as requested by Jefferson County. The report addresses each tree to be removed or trimmed and has specific recommendations to each tree based on its species. The recommendations are incorporated as conditions of this permit approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on November 13, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: unstable shoreline slope stability; eagle; seismic; landslide 3; SARPA & SUSC aquifer recharge area; coastal SIPZ.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Susc. Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Critical Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1) All Industrial Land Uses (2) All Commercial Uses (3) All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Geohazard Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Coastal SIPZ
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record.
A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a vegetation trim and removal application only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
ZONING
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998.
|
|