|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/26/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Final Plat RECORDED Status "F"
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
2/15/2005
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Assessor finl plat sgn off
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
2/15/2005
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/30/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
DECISION APPROVAL (Status "A")
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/30/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/30/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Additional Info Request-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/30/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/28/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Application Received-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/2/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/1/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Date Assigned to Planner
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/1/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/22/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/28/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/29/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/29/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
12/30/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/1/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-GEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A geotechnical report was submitted in conjunction with a building permit application on an adjacent parcel, APN 901 114 027. The report concluded that the proposed building sites are grossing stable. The following recommendations should be considered with regards to development of the subject property:
1. Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maintained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most beneficial. Also the existing established trees and brush provide stabilization to the slopes and should be left in a relatively natural state.
2. The area where the gully used to drain into the ravine should be revegetated to reduce erosion. If erosion persists, it may need to be further protected from erosion (i.e. lined with rock, etc).
3. The pond created in the gully should have a way of releasing excess water to reduce the possibly of overtopping or breaking through the driveway leading to the shop. During the site visit, there appeared to be only a couple feet or so of water in the pond. It may be that the soil can infiltrate the water sufficiently enough that the pond would not fill up and that a release mechanism is not needed. It may be possible to monitor the situation to determine if improvements are necessary. A portable sump pump and hoses could be kept on hand if needed.
4. Heavy irrigation on other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. one cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near slopes.
5. Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to a detention basin, dry well, other drainage control device such that surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties will not be higher than predevelopment conditions. Further, footing drains should be incorporated into the design of the home.
6. All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year.
7. Silt fence or other sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-MARK ADU ON SURVEY
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Parcel "A" new configuration (two (2) dwelling units on one parcel) is a result of this finaled Boundary Line Adjustment. Unified Development Code allows each legal lot of record to have one single-family residence and one accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on site. The existing manufactured home on Parcel "A" shall be designated as an ADU and shall be depicted on the survey.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-NOTICE TO TITLE
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar:
JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC
The new configuration of Parcel "A" (two (2) dwelling units on one parcel) is a result of this finaled Boundary Line Adjustment. The entirety of Parcel "A" cannot be separated base on the provision of density exemption. Parcel "A" can only be segregated through a formal subdivision application if densities are in place at time of such application to allow such a division.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-NOTICE TO TITLE
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar:
JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC
Current Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) maps identify the presence of an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) such as stream, wetland, flood, landslide hazard area, erosion, aquifer recharge area, SIPZ, fish and wildlife habitat, shoreline, etc., lying within and/or adjacent to the revised parcels encompassed by this Boundary Line Adjustment. Prior to any land disturbing activity or construction activity, applicant/owner shall contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development regarding compliance for such ESA's. Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee issuance of a building permit within said parcel(s). Such determination is dependent on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and ESA requirements.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-RECORDING
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.3.c, the applicant/surveyor is responsible for recording the Statement of Intent with the Jefferson County Auditor and referencing said statement of Intent AFN on the face of the survey. (An Excise Tax Affidavit will need to be completed for the Statement of Intent. An Excise Tax Affidavit is also required for every document that will be recorded such as Quit Claim Deeds or Statutory Warranty Deeds.) The survey mylar and recording fee of $85 (plus $1 for additional names and $5 for each additional sheet payable to the Jefferson County Auditor shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for department signatures and recording of said mylar.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-30 FT EASEMENT
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Access to Parcel "B" is from a 30 ft easement along the western boundary of Parcel "A". This proposed access is not a part of the 30 ft easement for ingress/egress and utilities easement recorded under AFN 319113. This 30 ft graphically portrayed easement shall have its own label as to its function (e.g.ingress/egress and/or utilities) referenced on the face of the final survey map.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Slide Buffer-Native Vegetation
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Identify Landslide Hazard Buffer
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer - Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation."
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Do Not Disturb Buffer
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Permanent Landslide Boundary
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Conditions (SFR)
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-DNR SITE VERIFIED NO STREAM
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Department of Natural Resources investigated the property for a potential stream. A letter from DNR dated August 31, 2004 which concluded that no evidence of a defined channel and therefore no typed water.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-ZON
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This parcel has been designated as Rural Residential 1:20 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CONSISTENT WITH
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal complies with UDC Section 7.2.1.a(1) in that the proposal is to create more suitable building lots and better access.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CONSISTENT WITH
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(1), the proposal will not create an additional lot, tract, or parcel.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CONSISTENT WITH
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(2) , the proposal is not within a binding site plan.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CONSISTENT WITH
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(3), the proposal will not relocate an entire lot, tract, or parcel.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CONSISTENT WITH
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(4), the proposal is not inconsistent with the conditions of approval of any restrictions or covenants.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on September 28, 2004 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 5 Streams, Seismic Hazard Areas, Level I Landslide Hazard Areas and Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Araes.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SUBMITTED
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
A Geotechnical Report prepared by Northwestern Territories Inc dated December 19, 2001 on APN 901 114 027 was submitted in conjunction with the application to address the slopes in the area and the relative stability.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Susc. Aquifer Recharge Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Geohazard Area
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Native Vegetation List
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir (Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar (Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla).
Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana).
Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium Parvifolium).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(j).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-APPROVAL FOR BLA ONLY
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a boundary line adjustment only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|