Permit Case Summary

Case Number: Search Help

Case Number:SDP2013-00045 Case Status: Date Received:11/14/2013
Description:Shoreline substantial development (for a secondary use) and flood development permit to construct a segment of the Rick Tollefson Trail from H.J. Carroll Park to Old Hadlock Road. The proposal is to construct a non-motorized public trail for recreation and transportation within an existing trail easement. The trail will cross Chimacum Creek, which is a shoreline of the state. The applicant has submitted a stormwater site plan report, a geotechnical report, a habitat management plan, and a cultural resources report. Date Issued:3/28/2016
Applicant: JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Expiration Date:3/28/2018 12:00:00 AM
Site Address:...... Case Finaled:
Parcel No:901113002 Other Cases Parcel Data Map It Parcels Images

Case Actions
Below is a list of actions that have been taken by staff for this permit case. They are sorted based on the date they were added to the database with most recent actions at the top. A value in the "Date Completed" field indicates that the action has been completed.
Description: Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
Date Completed: 10/4/2022
Disposition: DONE
Description: File Archived
Date Completed: 2/22/2019
Disposition: DONE
Description: Issue CUP/Variance Permit
Date Completed: 3/28/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Issue CUP/Variance Permit
Date Completed: 3/21/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Issue CUP/Variance Permit
Date Completed: 3/21/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Hearing Examiner Decision
Date Completed: 3/21/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Hearing Date
Date Completed: 3/21/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Updated/Add'l Info Recv'd
Date Completed: 2/12/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Updated/Add'l Info Recv'd
Date Completed: 1/14/2016
Disposition:
Description: Hearing Exam PH Notice-Pub-UF
Date Completed: 1/8/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Hearing Exam PH Notice-APO-UF
Date Completed:
Disposition:
Description: Return Status to Pending "P"
Date Completed: 8/26/2015
Disposition: DONE
Description: Status to PIA Pending Inactive
Date Completed: 7/16/2015
Disposition: DONE
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 2/28/2014
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 2/28/2014
Disposition: PEND
Description: A Clock Interrupt
Date Completed: 9/10/2015
Disposition: DONE
Description: Additional Info Request-DRD
Date Completed: 9/10/2015
Disposition: DONE
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 1/27/2014
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 1/27/2014
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 1/27/2014
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 1/27/2014
Disposition:
Description: Ntc of App +30-Publish-UF
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: Ntc of App +30-Publish-UF
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: Ntc of App +30-APO-UF
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: DRD Reviewer Letter (F)
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: Det. of Completeness-UF
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 12/11/2013
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 12/11/2013
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 11/15/2013
Disposition: PEND
Description: DCD Review Time
Date Completed: 11/15/2013
Disposition:
Description: Consistency Review-U
Date Completed: 1/8/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
Date Completed: 1/8/2016
Disposition: DONE
Description: Stormwater Review-U
Date Completed: 2/26/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: App Substantially Complete-U
Date Completed: 1/16/2014
Disposition: DONE
Description: Case Entered
Date Completed: 11/14/2013
Disposition:

Case Conditions
Below is a list of conditions for this permit case. Conditions typically record requirements that the applicant must meet to be in compliance with the permit.
Title: HEARING EXAMINER CONDITION
Wording The applicant shall adhere to all conditions in the Hearing Examiner Decision (dated February 10, 2016): 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. At the time of building application, the applicant shall submit plan sheets for the trail signs that comply with the sign code in place at the time of building application. 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Margie Bigelow with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to ensure compliance with HPA requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project to show compliance with federal permitting requirements, including the FEMA BiOp. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures, they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all conclusions and recommendations presented in the geotechnical report prepared by GeoEngineers (dated December 16, 2013). 9. The applicant shall implement the proposed mitigation described in the November 29, 2015 Addendum to Critical Areas Report and the landscaping sheets L1 through L12 submitted on August 13, 2015 letter (entitled Additional SEPA Items EXCEPT that varieties of native species, such as Blizzard Mock Orange (Philadelphus Lewsii ‘Blizzard’) and amethyst coralberry (Symphoricarpos x Doorenbosii ‘Kordes’) shall not be planted within any fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, wetland, or critical area buffer. No landscaping varieties or non-native plant species shall be installed within a critical area or buffer. Prior to building final, DCD shall verify that only native species have been installed within the critical areas, buffers, and mitigation area, as per the approved mitigation proposal and this permit condition. 10. The applicant shall implement the stormwater control plan in the Stormwater Site Plan Report prepared for this project by Nakano Associates (dated December 13, 2013) and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. The trail shall be used for day recreational uses only; overnight recreational uses are prohibited. 13. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff form carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or stormdrains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 14. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 15. A stormwater permit (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and a State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction) is required if both of the following are met: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has offsite discharge to waters of the state or stormdrains or will have offsite discharge during construction. 16. The applicant shall adhere to the protocols in the March 20, 2013 letter from the Suquamish Tribe if any inadvertent archaeological resource or humban remains are found.


Case Findings
Below is a list of findings for this permit case. Findings typically record facts that the staff are using as the basis of their permit processing decisions.
Title: F-STAFF REPORT FINDING
Wording The findings for this shoreline permit are presented in the staff report prepared for the hearing examiner (dated January 19, 2016).

Title: F-General PMT Notice
Wording NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments are included as "critical habitat" for listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: - All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees - Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a "take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.