Permit Case Summary

Case Number: Search Help

Case Number:SDP2011-00009	Case Status:	Date Received:2/23/2011
Description:SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING FACILITIES: THE EXISTING MARINA SUSTAINED DAMAGE DUE TO A STORM THAT OCCURRED IN NOVEMBER 2010. THE EMERGENCY CONSTRUCTION IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY FROM FUTURE DAMAGE BY THE ELEMENTS. THERE WILL BE NO EXPANSION OF THE OVERWATER STRUCTURES AND NO DEVELOPMENT OF NEW OVERWATER STRUCTURES AS A RESULT OF THE REPAIR. ALL WORK WILL BE IN LIKE KIND AND CONFIGURATION AS THE EXISTING STRUCTURES.	Date Issued:6/1/2011
Applicant: M SUKI CO LLC	Expiration Date:6/1/2012 12:00:00 AM
Site Address:310 HADLOCK BAY RD	Case Finaled:
Parcel No:901014007	Other Cases	Parcel Data	Map It	Parcels	Images

Case Actions

Below is a list of actions that have been taken by staff for this permit case. They are sorted based on the date they were added to the database with most recent actions at the top. A value in the "Date Completed" field indicates that the action has been completed.

Description: Status updtd - Energov Convrsn Date Completed: 10/4/2022 Disposition: DONE

Description: File Archived Date Completed: 8/1/2018 Disposition: DONE

Description: Approve Exemption-UF Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Review Complete-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Det. of Completeness-UF Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Case Entered Date Completed: 2/23/2011 Disposition:

Description: App Substantially Complete-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Stormwater Review-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Env. Sensitive Area Review-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: Consistency Review-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Description: RAP Review Complete-U Date Completed: 6/1/2011 Disposition: DONE

Case Conditions

Below is a list of conditions for this permit case. Conditions typically record requirements that the applicant must meet to be in compliance with the permit.

Title: Other Work/Separate Approval Wording Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.

Title: Site Plan Wording Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on March 1, 2011 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology.

Title: NO SHOOTING AREA Wording This parcel is within a no shooting area per JCC 8.50.

Title: Exempt Maintenance Condition Wording The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance.

Case Findings

Below is a list of findings for this permit case. Findings typically record facts that the staff are using as the basis of their permit processing decisions.

Title: F-EXEMPT FROM CAO Wording This proposal is exempt from the provisions in Chapter JCC 18.22 (Critical Areas) per JCC 18.22.070(6) which states, "Reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance of existing structures. This exemption shall not apply to reconstruction which is proposed as a result of structural damage associated with a geologically hazardous area and does not allow further intrusion into a wetland, fish and wildlife habitat conservation area and/or their buffers."

Title: F-SEPA Exempt Wording Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3).

Title: ZONING Wording The parcel has been designated as Urban Growth Area - Visitor Oriented Commercial under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998, as amended.

Title: F-General PMT Notice Wording NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: - All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees - Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Title: F-SDP Exemption Section Wording The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section JCC 18.25.090(6) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.