|
Description:
|
| | |
Status updtd - Energov Convrsn
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
10/4/2022
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Print Dummy UDC Permit-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/6/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
7/23/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/11/2009
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Hydraulic Code/HPA Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Army Corps Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-PROJECT DESCRIPTION
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project will remove hydrocarbon laden soils, concrete footings, and oil soaked wooden bulkhead from the nearshore and replace them with clean marine sediment. Initial estimates indicate up to 230 cubic yards of soils will need to be removed and hauled to Waste Management Olympic View Transfer Station in Bremerton. 80 tons of concrete footings will be hauled to an approved dump site. The project is follow up to DNR's removal of the failed building structure in 2008.
Project work will take place completely in the dry, though some work may take place below MHHW during a single low tide. Work will be staged so that the bulk of fill and concrete footing removal will take place above MHHW first. Then during a single low tide, excavator will remove the oil soaked wooden bulkhead, and any contaminated soils below MHHW. Initial soil investigations indicate excavations will not need to go much beyond MHHW. Clean sediments will be used to fill any excavations below MHHW and be contoured to meet the existing grade outside of the contaminated soils footprint.
Silt fencing will be placed surrounding the work area to minimize impacts outside of the work zone. Native plants to be used to revegetate.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-STREAMLINED FINDING
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
RCW 77.55.290(4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity.
Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act area consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations.
The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs.
The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish and Wildlife Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal qualifies as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project and is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290, which states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for a shoreline exemption for a Streamline Fish Habitat Enhancement Project only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-General PMT Notice
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code.
If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once.
The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following:
- All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters
- Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees
- Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there
- Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches
Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program JCC 18.25.090 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|