|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/30/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Close case
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
11/30/2007
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Det. of Completeness-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/2/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Septic Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
5/17/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Site Plan
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on April 28, 2006 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Progress towards completion
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Exempt Maintenance Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
C-DISTURBED AREAS
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All disturbed areas not covered with rock or gravel shall be revegated with native vegetation.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Army Corps Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-ESA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The proposal should not entail any new areas to be disturbed or native vegetation removed to restore the Larry Scott Trail to its pre-storm condition in the same location.
Because this activity was declared an emergency it is exempt from review of Environmentally Sensitive Areas under Section 18.15.210(1) of the Jefferson County Code (JCC).
In addition, Section 18.15.215(3) of the JCC states that a use established prior to the effective date of Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code (January 16, 2001) (like the Larry Scott Trail) may be repaired or maintained without limitation of Section 18.15 of the JCC. Furthermore, Section 18.15.215(4) of the JCC states that the use may be restored and the use resumed.
Based on the above, with the exception of shoreline requirements of the SMMP, ESA idenified with the proposed location are not addressed in this permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The applicant shall be responsible to obtain required permits from the City of Port Townsend for the portion of the project loacted within the City Limits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on May 17, 2006 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 1 marine shoreline (Urban/Aquatic), Eagle Habitat (Priority Species & Heritage), seismic, erosion, & landslide hazard, susceptible aquifer recharge, and coastal SIPZ.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Native Vegetation List
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir (Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar (Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla).
Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana).
Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium Parvifolium).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Stormwater
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Based on the proposal to restore the Larry Scott Trail to its pre-storm condition, the proposal should not create any new impervious surface or land disturbing activities. Sections 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 of the Jefferson County Code require that your proposal comply with Construction Best Management Practices (attached).
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-HPA Issued
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this activity on February 8, 2006 under Log Number 104038-01. The HPA expires on February 22, 2006.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-880 - Emergencies.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan and JARPA as submitted with the Shoreline Application (SDP 06-07) on April 28, 2006 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan and JARPA dated May 17, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for the placement of rip-rap and associated improvements for the reconstruction and repair of the Larry Scott Trail ) to its pre-storm condition. This approval is for the portion of the Larry Scott Trail located outside of the City of Port Townsend. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This project repairs/reconstructs the Larry Scott Train in its traditional location and to a similar condition that existed prior to the high storm surges.
Therefore, the proposed repair/reconstruct the Larry Scott trail is exempt from the SMMP under Section 18.25.090 (6) of the JCC, which is normal repair and maintenance. This proposal also qualifies as an exemption under emergency construction under 18.25.090(8), which are emergencies.
Consequently this proposal is exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|