|
Description:
|
| | |
File Archived
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
1/26/2006
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Close case
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
9/13/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Approve Exemption-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Application Received-UF
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/16/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Case Entered
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/16/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
App Substantially Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Stormwater Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Env. Sensitive Area Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
Consistency Review-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Description:
|
| | |
RAP Review Complete-U
|
|
Date Completed:
|
| | |
8/18/2004
|
|
Disposition:
|
| | |
DONE
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Other Work/Separate Approval
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Treated Materials Must be Cured
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
All lumber and other materials treated with preservative shall be sufficiently cured to minimize leaching into the water or shore bed, in accordance with the Best Management Practices approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Site Plan
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on August 13, 2004 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Exempt Maintenance Condition
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
No Fill or Other Material
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
BMPs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Hydraulic Code/HPA Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Comply with HPA
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
Army Corps Check
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Confirmed ESAs
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 18, 2004 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (over marine waters) and stormwater.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SEPA Exempt
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800((3) - Repair and Maintenance Activities.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Site Plan Changes
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The site plan as submitted with the shoreline exemption application (SDP 04-39) on has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated August 18, 2004 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-Approval for _____ Only
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
This approval is for the replacement of a single pile and stringer section associated with an existing dock only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-HPA & CORP. OF ENGINEERS PERMIT
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
Issues related to over-water development activities (including materials, methods, timing, etc.) will be addressed by the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA and/or Corp of Engineers Permit.
|
|
|
Title:
|
| | |
F-SDP Exemption Section
|
|
Wording
|
| | |
The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.(6) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements.
|
|